Choose a source-dated city workflow for restaurant facilities your team already manages or is authorized to review. Each guide keeps the inspection date and the publisher's original context visible.
New York City
Review historical NYC DOHMH findings labeled Critical by the publisher, with the inspection date and source publication context kept together.
Official publisher · NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Open New York City recordsChicago
Review historical City of Chicago Restaurant inspection records whose published result is Fail, with the inspection date and publisher result preserved.
Official publisher · City of Chicago Open Chicago recordsSan Antonio, Texas
Review selected San Antonio facilities against the Metropolitan Health District’s dated weekly restaurant reports, with the publisher total score and report link kept together. A report is historical source context, not a current-condition conclusion.
Official publisher · San Antonio Metropolitan Health District Open San Antonio, Texas recordsCincinnati
Review historical Cincinnati Health Department rows whose publisher description literally contains “Controlling Pests,” with the inspection date and published action status preserved.
Official publisher · Cincinnati Health Department Open Cincinnati recordsSeattle
Review historical Public Health — Seattle & King County rows whose publisher result is Unsatisfactory and whose city field is Seattle, with the inspection date preserved.
Official publisher · Public Health — Seattle & King County Open Seattle recordsMontgomery County, Maryland
Review historical Montgomery County food-inspection rows with the publisher’s rodents-and-insects field and separate overall inspection status kept together.
Official publisher · Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services Open Montgomery County, Maryland recordsBoston
Review historical Boston Inspectional Services Department Food Establishment Inspections records whose publisher result is HE_Fail, with the inspection date and original result kept together.
Official publisher · Boston Inspectional Services Department Open Boston recordsLas Vegas
Review historical Southern Nevada Health District records for exact Las Vegas facilities with publisher grades B, C, or CLOSED, alongside inspection dates.
Official publisher · Southern Nevada Health District Open Las Vegas recordsDetroit
Review dated Detroit Health Department records whose publisher is_in_compliance field is False. The City documents a publication lag, which remains visible in the selected-facility source guide.
Official publisher · Detroit Health Department Open Detroit recordsMinneapolis
Review dated Minneapolis Health Department records for selected facilities where the publisher FoodCodeText literally mentions pest, rodent, or insect. The guide stays out of search until its source-date guard is current.
Official publisher · Minneapolis Health Department Open Minneapolis recordsNew York State
Review source-dated New York State Department of Health latest-inspection records for selected food-service facilities outside the separate NYC workflow, with the publisher critical-count fields and inspection date kept together. The guide is source-date gated.
Official publisher · New York State Department of Health Open New York State recordsMaricopa County, Arizona
Check one selected facility against the County public search using its exact name, street address, and named municipality. This is a manual source check, not a directory or an automatic monitoring feed.
Official publisher · Maricopa County Environmental Services Open Maricopa County, Arizona recordsFlorida
Review historical Florida DBPR food-service inspection records for selected accounts, with inspection date, disposition, and publisher-count context preserved.
Official publisher · Florida DBPR Division of Hotels and Restaurants Open Florida recordsSan Francisco
Review selected San Francisco food-service records where publisher text contains “vermin,” with the inspection date and publisher status preserved.
Official publisher · San Francisco Department of Public Health Open San Francisco recordsFor facilities your organization operates, manages, or is authorized to review. Keep the named publisher and inspection date beside each facility file.
Open selected-portfolio monitoringFor selected food-service customer facilities your team already serves or is authorized to review. This is account monitoring, not a prospect list.
Open pest-control account monitoringFor selected food-service customer facilities your refrigeration, exhaust/hood, plumbing, equipment, or facilities-service team already serves or is authorized to review.
Open kitchen-service account monitoringStart with a facility your team knows. The selected-account workflow keeps named-source context beside the facility file and can notify an enabled account only after a later successful collection retains a newly collected matching publisher row. It does not say an inspection just occurred.
Start with a facility your team knows. Read the agency's published fields in their date context, then verify consequential information with the issuing agency and responsible facility team. ViolationNet does not turn a historical inspection record into a current-condition claim or a permission to contact anyone.