Which markets are available?

This workflow is currently limited to named NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, City of Chicago, San Antonio Metropolitan Health District weekly restaurant reports with the publisher total score preserved, Cincinnati Health Department, Public Health — Seattle & King County for Seattle-labeled records, Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services for named local Maryland markets, Boston Inspectional Services Department, Southern Nevada Health District for exact Las Vegas facilities, Detroit Health Department, Minneapolis Health Department, New York State Department of Health outside the separate NYC workflow, Florida DBPR, and San Francisco Department of Public Health food-service inspection sources. Detroit's publisher documents a reporting delay. Minneapolis and New York State remain searchable only while their publisher-date freshness guards are current, and the Montgomery County source preserves a narrower rodents-and-insects field separately from its publisher inspection status. Each source page identifies the original publisher and date context.

Who can use this workflow?

It is for restaurant facilities a team operates, manages, or is otherwise authorized to review. Historical public records are not a restaurant directory, contact list, service-need determination, or outreach authorization.

Does a record establish a current health condition?

No. The source record describes what the issuing agency published for an inspection date. Confirm consequential information with the issuing agency and responsible facility team.

Selected facilities only

Restaurant inspection monitoring for locations you operate.

Q: When can portfolio monitoring send an alert?

After an account's initial source baseline, ViolationNet can email an enabled account when a later successful collection retains a newly collected matching publisher row. The alert describes the public record; it does not state that an inspection just occurred or establish a current facility condition.

Set a source-dated baseline around named NYC, Chicago, San Antonio, Cincinnati, Seattle, Montgomery County, Boston, Las Vegas, Detroit, Minneapolis, New York State, Florida, and San Francisco official food-service records for facilities your organization operates, manages, or is authorized to review. A later successful collection can alert an enabled account when it retains a newly collected matching publisher row.

01 / SELECT

Start with locations you know.

Add facilities your organization operates, manages, or is authorized to review. Keep the list bounded to work your team actually owns.

02 / REVIEW

Keep the publisher visible.

Review the issuing agency, inspection date, and published record context together—without converting historical entries into present-tense claims.

03 / VERIFY

Use your operating process.

Confirm consequential information with the issuing agency and responsible facility team before making any operational decision.

Named market: New York State

For selected food-service facilities outside the separate NYC workflow, the New York State Department of Health publishes a dated latest-inspection record with critical-count fields. The guide stays searchable only while the publisher-date guard is current; a row is historical source context, not a current restaurant status or operating conclusion.

New York StateNew York State Department of Health · source-dated latest-inspection critical-count fieldsReview New York State source records

Named market: San Antonio, Texas

The San Antonio Metropolitan Health District publishes weekly restaurant reports. For a selected San Antonio facility, ViolationNet preserves the dated publisher total score and individual report link together; a historical report is not a current restaurant status or operating conclusion.

San Antonio, TXSan Antonio Metropolitan Health District · dated weekly report and publisher total scoreReview San Antonio source records

How selected-portfolio monitoring works

Your first successful source scan establishes a historical baseline. With property email alerts enabled, a later successful collection can notify your account only when it retains a newly collected matching publisher row. The notice reports source context; it does not say an inspection just occurred or establish a current facility condition.

After setup, the private source-record review queue can show one latest retained publisher row for each selected active location, with its issuing authority, record date, source link, and match scope. It is not a public restaurant directory and does not state a current location condition.

Preview a small selected-portfolio list before trial.

Paste up to 10 facilities your organization operates, manages, or is authorized to review. We return only a source-match receipt for named NYC, Chicago, San Antonio, Cincinnati, Seattle, Montgomery County, Boston, Las Vegas, Detroit, Minneapolis, New York State, Florida, and San Francisco publishers, so you can test the workflow before setup.

Current source register

ViolationNet exposes this workflow only where a named official publisher supports it. Review the source fields and date context before adding a facility.

New York CityNYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene · publisher-labeled Critical findingsReview NYC source records

ChicagoCity of Chicago · Restaurant records with the publisher result preservedReview Chicago source records

CincinnatiCincinnati Health Department · source rows whose publisher description literally contains “Controlling Pests”Review Cincinnati source records

SeattlePublic Health — Seattle & King County · Seattle-labeled records with the publisher result Unsatisfactory preservedReview Seattle source records

BostonBoston Inspectional Services Department · Food Establishment Inspection records with the HE_Fail result preservedReview Boston source records

Las VegasSouthern Nevada Health District · exact Las Vegas facilities with B, C, or CLOSED publisher gradesReview Las Vegas source records

FloridaFlorida DBPR · food-service records with publisher high-priority counts preservedReview Florida DBPR source records

San FranciscoSan Francisco Department of Public Health · source rows whose publisher text contains “vermin”Review San Francisco source records

New named market: Montgomery County, Maryland

For named local Montgomery County facilities, this official source preserves a rodents-and-insects field separately from the broader publisher inspection status. Review both fields in their historical source-date context.

Montgomery County, MDMontgomery County Department of Health and Human Services · source-dated historical fields, not a present operational conclusionReview Montgomery County source records

New named market: Detroit, Michigan

Detroit Health Department records preserve the publisher’s historical is_in_compliance field with the inspection date. The City documents a publication delay, so this source is not presented as a current-status or immediate-alert feed.

Detroit, MIDetroit Health Department · dated historical source records with publication-delay contextReview Detroit source records

Named market: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Minneapolis Health Department records retain literal publisher FoodCodeText that mentions pest, rodent, or insect with its inspection date. The source guide stays searchable only while the publisher-date freshness guard is current; a historical row is not a current restaurant status or operating conclusion.

Minneapolis, MNMinneapolis Health Department · dated literal publisher text with a source-date freshness gateReview Minneapolis source records

Source-receipt status

This is the status of ViolationNet's retained collection, not a publisher conclusion about a facility. A missing or stale receipt is shown as unavailable rather than as zero records or an implied recent check.

New York City · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
Chicago · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
San Antonio, TX · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
Cincinnati, OH · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
Seattle · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
Montgomery County, MD · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
Boston · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
Las Vegas · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
Detroit, MI · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
Minneapolis · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
New York State · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
Florida · latest successful source collection: 2026-09-18.
San Francisco · no current successful source receipt is available; this does not mean zero records or no coverage.

What this is: selected-facility, source-dated public-record research. What it is not: a restaurant directory, contact list, risk score, safety conclusion, compliance determination, or outreach authorization. Read the selected-location workflow guide.